Follow us on or join ours

The article is an entry from a series of loose thoughts of the author about the impact that technology can have blockchain all over the world. This article deals with broadly understood banking. In subsequent entries the author will try to navigate further topics and solutions offered by the technology in practice.

Does the blockchain and the technology behind it have a chance to lead to a real world revolution?

This question is asked by every novice amateur cryptocut as soon as he convinces himself what is a decentralized transaction register and how blockchain works. The following article summarizes the short history of money and explains what aspects of modern monetary policy can move technology Blockchain.

Exchange of goods formerly ...

Since the dawn of mankind, the system of exchange of values ​​first in the form of barter and then in monetary form is based on one of the most important rules for all trade, i.e. trust in the means of payment. In old tribes, which numbered at most several hundred or several thousand individuals, trust it it could be easily verifiedcoins or money were unnecessary. It can be assumed that the barter exchange was not always "here and now" in such communities (just like the modern exchange of money for good). This exchange was made using a medium of trust. This trust allowed, for example, in the harsh winter to buy a tree for fuel from a lumberjack for a farmer. The next harvest did not take place until half a year - the lumberjack trusted and waited, and in the case of lies and deception the community of the dishonest delinquent quickly brought before the court. Contrary to popular opinion, the butcher did not have to go to the market and exchange pieces of meat for a tree, etc. Everything took place within one community on the principle of trust. People "confirmed" the transaction with their trust and thanks to that they could enforce it later in time. Interestingly, here we have a dual trust function in the form of a payment medium and a loan of trust. For the purposes of the article only, I allowed myself to divide barter transactions into direct and indirect transactions. Of course, as the size of a given society increased, more sophisticated exchange mechanisms had to be created, but this will soon be about ...

Barter exchange and trust

Barter exchange in the form of a direct exchange of some goods for another it was just a small part of the whole exchange based on trust. An interesting fact is that such a basic form of exchange in trade is doing well until today. From our home backyard, we can remember that a similar system until recently has functioned in Poland. During communism our domestic currency or Zloty was a commonly available payment for which you could purchase (in theory) all articles and services. The problem is that in fact there were periods that it was difficult to obtain a good for the currency due to shortages and chronic shortages in state stores. At that time, our Polish word "settled" was established. "For communes" you could "deal with" many articles, services or even jobs. The settlement was based on the fact that someone had the privilege of buying items, services, sometimes for a fee and sometimes for free in return for another "favor". Of course, this is not a form of classic barter exchange, but rather its largely modified form. Interestingly, in today's "free market" Poland, you can still hear about places (especially in the state administration) in which "Arranging" is functioning and is doing well to this day. The center of exchange of goods in the form of arranging also worked in a specific context and for a specific community - this is how you can summarize the word "settle" in the Polish language, that is, the carrier of trust. Such an exchange despite appearances is very efficient and cheap - you can say that it is free because there are no fees for transfers or for issuing a card - you only need to know someone important from a given group or remember your face. However, this system has one major disadvantage: it functions well only in small communities where everyone has an opinion and trust in each other. The growth of the community makes it difficult to remember all participants of the market game. Such exchange, therefore, does not make sense in large cities of several hundred thousand or several million inhabitants. Soon you say that in PRL it functioned well in cities that had several hundred thousand people? It worked that way, but it always concerned a specific group in a given context, and so these groups acted in some way independently of each other and additionally in secret because officially "settling" was associated with speculation and was forbidden. The "settled" was, among others: dollars from a cink-saw / horseman because not everyone could just buy - currency speculation was prosecuted and punished, so the horse had to know who he was selling. The director took care of the position and the director also preferred to know that he was dealing with a friend of a friend who, in thanksgiving, "dealt with" a larger membership period in anticipation of an apartment, etc.

In search of trust

In search of the perfect means of exchanging values ​​that could replace the barter used man tried to spread a medium of exchange of goods. First, they were intermediate barter items such as salt, animal skins, etc., then various kinds of shells, decorations, precious stones and finally gold. Shells had a negligible value, they had to be of a certain type, shape or in a specific way prepared (wound on strings, etc.). This made that "shelling" shells took as much time as their production and a negligible value did not compensate for the time and falsification. A low value meant that "bigger exchanges" had to involve more and more shells - so there was no bigger denomination (you could tangle 10 strings after 100 shells into one tuft but still occupied the same volume by volume). In larger communities, first moving a large number of goods and then the same number of shells did not make sense. Decorations and precious stones were good for larger transactions but their indivisibility continued to hinder trade for smaller transactions. It results from the fact of the so-called exchange rate - if someone had a precious stone, he did not always find a buyer with enough goods to exchange all the stone. The ideal solution was gold, divisible and widely accepted by every buyer - an ideal carrier of trust and value.

source: access 24-01-2019

Gold as a universal carrier of values

Gold has accompanied man since the beginning of history and from the beginning it also played the role of money, it was easy to divide. People quickly came up with the idea of ​​measuring a certain amount of gold, and on this basis first the state and then the separated banks began to beat different denominations of coins corresponding to the amount of gold contained in them. Gold in the form of coins seemed to be perfect money and in this form it accompanied man for many centuries.

At present, gold is recognized in international trade in every corner of the world, although it is not universally accepted as money, we can successfully exchange the gold coin for local currency in almost every corner of the world. Unfortunately, gold has a number of disadvantages and therefore it does not work as a full-fledged coin every day. Gold can be easily "spoiled" by adding a large amount of other metal alloys such as silver or copper. Countries that beat their own gold coins in times of crisis decided on such a spoiling of money by adding too much inferior metal to the alloy what today we would call inflation of money. Thus gold-based money was prone to "spoiling" and thus increasing inflation. Not only countries had a monopoly on the spoiling of zloty. All sorts of counterfeiters also used this susceptibility of gold to connect with other metals and put into circulation false coins. Large transactions required large amounts of gold. Large amounts of gold were, in turn, a tasty morsel for bandits, thieves and pirates. History in almost every corner of the globe is full of stories about stolen and hidden gold treasures. The transport of gold over longer distances had to involve more equipment and people, and thus it was expensive and very risky. Further discoveries of new gold deposits and further so-called the gold rush caused that the ore at various periods of history had large fluctuations in supply and, consequently, also large price changes. Despite all the disadvantages of storing, transporting and processing, gold is an irrefutable and difficult to falsify trust carrier and is still recognized all over the world.

Gold has quickly become a universal means of payment throughout the world thanks to it developed gold currency system. The zloty currency system is a hybrid of paper money and zloty money. The Central Bank of a given state kept in its vault a certain amount of gold (expressed in a certain amount of gold, usually the purest sample) and on this basis it could issue an appropriate amount of paper money, this was called gold parity and meant that the given unit of paper money was covered in a certain amount of gold deposited with the central bank. On the example of the US dollar, we can follow below how the value of 1 $ appeared in terms of the amount of gold at the beginning it was over 1504mg and now it is about 25mg.

source: access: 24-01-2019

Until the year 1933 the value of the dollar was, with small exceptions, constant in relation to the amount of gold contained in it. In 1933, the US abolished the exchangeability of the dollar for gold for its own citizens. In addition, it reduced the parity from previous 1504mg gold for 1 $ to 888mg for 1 $. The parity was still in force for international exchange and between banks of other countries. Eventually, the US in the 1971 year withdrew from this parity and the value of the dollar quickly dropped to 40mg for 1 dollar in the 1980 year. In practice, the purchasing power of the dollar for less than 100 years has dropped significantly. 1 $ from 1932 it was 1504mg gold which would be worth 61 $ now. As you can see, the dollar has fallen 60x in less than 100 years.

Fiduciary money - a recipe for continuous growth?

The current phase of money evolution is fiat money - in most countries, paper or electronic money based on trust in the issuing institution (usually the Central Bank). There is no more gold or other gold parity. The value of money is determined on the basis of an agreement between the central bank and the state. This means that every zloty in the portfolio is worth as much as the promise of the central bank and in practice, in addition to the generally accepted social contract, it has no value. This system allows for non-cash transactions, there is no need to transport gold from the treasury of one central bank to the treasury of another bank. There is also no need to store and guard gold. It is based on trust. The problem is that trust in a centralized institution called a central bank can easily be damaged. A centralized form of money emission management leads to fraud, in theory the central bank can generate any amount of money at any time. In practice, there are mechanisms that are supposed to protect against it, but often these mechanisms fail, which leads to the escalation of undesirable features of the monetary economy.

Such undesirable feature is, for example, the amount of debt or the amount of money borrowed in the monetary circulation. In the gold parity, the bank that lent money had to have the appropriate security in the form of gold, he also had to consider who he lends money to because he was responsible for it with his own gold. Currently, there are no such collateral so banks often use the privilege of borrowing money that they do not actually have. This leads to an unhealthy situation and the build-up of a problem. Money printed from the air increases the supply on the money market by what all prices are rising (inflation). Inflation is really the next tax levied on the citizens of a given monetary system, in addition a tax on which you can not escape in any way and which applies to all consumers without exception. This situation causes the average consumer to spend money (because they lose their value anyway), it is often the case that the annual inflation rate is higher than the interest rate on the term deposit in the bank, which additionally discourages saving money. Issuing money as we know leads to an overall increase in consumption. Enterprises, seeing this as an interest, apply for further loans for financing future ventures, and here the circle closes. Such an economic monster can only function in conditions of constantly increasing consumption and economic growth. Normally, consumption was limited by limited supply of gold and thus by money, which made it more profitable to save and invest money collected (gold). In the modern model, it is better to spend money on anything than to keep and save.

Consumption is currently limited only in two ways: naturally, by increasing raw material prices and increasing production and manufacturing prices to an exorbitant size or centrally by the same institution that has recently cheerfully added empty money to the market as to the furnace, i.e. by the Central Bank. The natural increase in raw material prices takes place in every business cycle. Central limitation is another manipulation, while the increase in raw material prices (ie their structural shortage) is a serious global problem. The current monetary system is really the central bank's authority over everything. Central banks can decide on what purpose will be spent money printed on, which can often be seen in mainstream media as a fight against the crisis by co-financing a large business (eg co-financing of car makers by the US government) using preferential loans in 2010-2013 years), implementation of social programs (500 + programs, flat + and derivatives). Unfortunately, the winners in this system are always banks at the expense of the whole society. The virtually unlimited possibility of manipulating the money supply always leads to a crisis in the end.

A currency based on blockchain, a way to cope with the problems of the modern monetary system

As already explained in the previous paragraph, the power of central banks and the issue of money leads to many pathologies of the monetary system and practically boils down to the principle:

"Whoever has power over the issue of money has total power"

The ideal solution would be to base money on trust as it did in the case of money based on gold and barter. The problem is that it's hard to operate with confidence alone when we have more than 7 billion people in the world, so the trust itself is gone. In turn, the return to the parity of gold is today considered by many economists as a remedy and a cure for inflation crises. We can agree with this but there is a problem of its securing and transport in large quantities (the more gold, the greater operational costs associated with transactions) and besides gold has already been and has been supplanted by the current system.

Blockchain and cryptocurrencies based on it can be technology that will consolidate the advantages of all monetary systems and at the same time get rid of the disadvantages of the current monetary system. A currency based on a blockchain such as Bitcoin, for example, has the advantages of several systems (gold, barter and monetary). The main advantages of cryptocurrencies (including BTC) are:

  • Very large divisibility into smaller denominations (1 $ can be divided into 100 cents for comparison 1 BTC can be divided into 100 000 000 Satoshi).
  • Decentralization and independence. The BTC network, unlike the banking system, is not subject to any centralized authority or organization
  • Inflation under control. The amount of BTC in circulation is constantly monitored. The final amount is known and will be: 21mln BTC. After the extraction of the last BTC, inflation will cease.
  • Interchangeability in every place in the world. To trade with BTC, it is enough to use a smartphone or other device and access to the internet. There is no need for a bank account, paper money, cards, terminals, etc.
  • Trust in the money is based on mathematics and cryptography. The Central Bank and no institution can do anything.
  • No forgery. Counterfeits are the scourge of modern monetary systems. Criminal groups are falsifying money from around the world. In the case of cryptocurrencies, this is impossible.
  • No borders. BTC, unlike SWIFT transfers, does not concern itself with the borders of particular countries or monetary systems. Transfer to a technically seated person is performed in the same way as a transfer to a person on the other side of the globe.
  • Low fees for each transfer or lack of them - of course everyone will remind you that during the last bubble in 2017 transfers in BTC were expensive and slow is a fact! But now new generation cryptocurrencies are being developed where the theoretical number of transfers made per second may soon surpass payment operators in this respect and the transfer fee will be very small or even zero!
  • Possibility to use smart-contractów that is, special electronic automatic contracts - you can very easily create a decentralized system that will associate lenders and borrowers with each other without intermediaries. Banks currently take high commissions for lending in the future these commissions may disappear completely in a monetary system based on blockchain.
  • No fees for owning and issuing a cryptocurrency portfolio. Banks often have to pay for account maintenance, card issuance or introduce fees for using the functionality. In the case of cryptocurrency portfolios, you do not have to pay for anything. Having a wallet with any number of cryptocurrencies does not bear any costs (except for commissions on transactions that are becoming smaller and in the future they will probably be free).
  • Security. Cryptocurrency cryptographic keys are currently unbreakable by any software. The only way a thief can steal cryptocurrencies is knowing the key-code. In the case of banks, things look different, there are attacks on ATMs, attacks using customer data, etc. Technologically cryptocurrencies provide better security than banks.
  • Transparency of transactions - cryptocurrencies can be divided in this respect into two types: ordinary and anonymous. Ordinary cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin ensure total transaction transparency in the so-called Blockchain Explorer. We can view any historical or current transaction from any portfolio interested in us. This solution gives us complete insight into the flow of capital. In the future, it will be possible to create a mechanism that will track all transactions above a certain amount of transaction so as to detect embezzlement, avoiding paying taxes, etc. Anonymous cryptocurrencies try to hide the origin of the transaction and can be used to carry out the so-called anonymous transactions. This solution can be useful for small transactions. Currently, each user can choose any cryptocurrency and make transactions anonymously or transparently.
  • No fees for currency conversion and increased fees for foreign transfers. As already mentioned, cryptocurrencies do not know the boundaries, so there is no concept of currency conversion or international transfer fee.
  • The ability to improve the fiscal system of a given country. Here, smart-contracts can be used in the future to calculate and automatically pay due taxes. Currently, the flow of money from the taxpayer to the state is colloquially speaking "spontaneous". A number of regulations, legal uncertainties and the "operational" process of collecting due taxes mean that large companies and corporations often do not pay taxes or pay them much less than they should. In the future, smart-contract will be able to carry out the relevant levies at any time in every company for each transaction. Transparency and decentralization of the system means that such a smart-contract properly designed will be infallible.

As you can see, cryptocurrencies have a number of advantages over the current monetary system. In the comments you can submit your comments, if an important aspect has been omitted, please comment.

The definition of indirect and direct barter was used only for this article in the context of the transaction trust factor and is not an official definition used in economics.

Below the infographic showing the development of the monetary system: is a cryptocurrency site run by a crypto team of enthusiasts. The main area of ​​our interest are cryptocurrencies, tokens, personal tokens as well as blockchain technology. On the pages of our website we will present independent cryptocurrency reviews and interesting articles from the market. In addition, we present the current rates of all critics. The site also has a multi-functional cryptocurrency calculator as well as traditional currencies.

The information published on the cryptocurrency website are not financial recommendations and do not constitute investment recommendations within the meaning of the Regulation of the Minister of Finance of 19 October 2005 on information being recommendations regarding financial instruments, their issuers or issuers (Journal of Laws of 2005, No. 206, item 1715). The information published on the pages of the portal does not constitute an offer. is not responsible for any decisions taken under the influence of data presented on the Website. Portal does not bear any responsibility for the possible use of information on the website.

Investments in OTC market instruments, including currency exchange rate (CFD) contracts, due to the use of the leverage mechanism, entail the possibility of incurring losses exceeding the value of the deposit. It is not possible to make a profit on transactions on OTC instruments, including currency exchange contracts (CFDs) without risking a loss, therefore contracts for exchange differences (CFDs) may not be suitable for all investors.

© Copyright 2019

My Newsletter

Sign Up For Updates & Newsletters